ÐÔÊӽ紫ý

For many Missourians, especially in rural or low-income areas, public radio and television are far more than entertainment. TheyÐÔÊӽ紫ý™re essential services. Now, those services are under threat.

The Trump administration has for the (CPB), which supports , , and hundreds of local stations across the country. This $1.1 billion cut would gut the infrastructure of public media, leaving many stations without the resources to continue serving their communities. If Congress approves, we are cutting off vital access to information for people who need it most.

Here in Missouri, we know the value of public broadcasting. In towns where broadband access is limited and local newspapers have shuttered, NPR affiliates are often the last remaining source of reliable news. For families navigating a fractured education system, PBS Kids programming offers a free and trusted learning tool. And for communities of color, immigrant populations, and other marginalized groups, public media has offered a rare platform to tell our stories and hear others like them.

I know the power of public broadcasting firsthand. In 2010, I was an intern at Nine PBS in St. Louis, where I saw how dedicated teams work tirelessly to deliver educational and cultural programming that reflects and serves our local communities. That experience continues to inform my belief in the role public media plays in strengthening democracy.

WhatÐÔÊӽ紫ý™s most frustrating about this proposal is that itÐÔÊӽ紫ý™s not taking place in isolation. At the same time that public broadcasting is vulnerable to losing needed funding, the federal budget for the Pentagon is on track to exceed . While billions are poured into weapons systems and defense contractors, pennies are being pinched from programs that inform, educate and unify.

At the , we advocate for a reallocation of public funds away from militarism and toward programs that strengthen our communities. That includes healthcare, education, climate resilience ÐÔÊӽ紫ý” and yes, public media.

When we spend more on missiles than on minds, we undermine both our security and our democracy.

Public broadcasting has proven to be one of the most cost-effective investments our government makes. The CPB costs each American about . For the price of a candy bar, we receive educational programming, local journalism, cultural enrichment, and civic discourse. These are the building blocks of a healthy democracy. They are not luxuries.

Cutting federal funding would also disproportionately harm stations in rural and underserved communities. Unlike urban stations that can supplement their budgets with corporate sponsorship and philanthropy, many small stations rely heavily on federal support. Without it, they may be forced to shut down or dramatically cut services. That means fewer local voices on the airwaves, fewer educational programs for kids, and less access to emergency information when itÐÔÊӽ紫ý™s needed most.

Defunding public broadcasting is shortsighted and dangerous. It weakens the flow of fact-based journalism at a time when disinformation is surging. It disconnects communities already struggling with isolation, and it sends a clear message that the voices of everyday Americans matter less than the interests of weapons manufacturers.

This administration would lead people to believe that public safety is about border walls and military bases. ItÐÔÊӽ紫ý™s actually more about social programs and access to reliable information, early childhood education, cultural expression, and civic participation. Public broadcasting supports all of these.

I urge MissouriÐÔÊӽ紫ý™s congressional delegationÐÔÊӽ紫ý”Democrats and Republicans alikeÐÔÊӽ紫ý”to reject this proposal. Stand up for the farmers tuning into . Stand up for the kids watching reruns in the far reaches of the heartland. Stand up for the voters who depend on unbiased election coverage, and for the storytellers who bring our regionÐÔÊӽ紫ý™s history and hopes to life.

Public broadcasting has always been about the public good. LetÐÔÊӽ紫ý™s make sure it stays that way.